"To Each According to His Wants" -- Rush Limbaugh

Let us begin by saying that "Mein Kampf" and "Das Capital" are 
both evil fairy tales pandering to the the most naive and vulnerable
of society.  They are both equally discredited.  And anyone 
with the least ability to do Aristotelian logic can see the 
ethical black hole created by them. But Karl Marx was, by
far, more evil than Hitler because after killing millions, after
stealing the possessions of billions of people, after treating
generations of brilliant young idealists as cattle, and after
condemning whole populations to slavery without the merest
glimmer of hope, the myth continues to poison the core of
good intentions for the entire human race.  


Optimistically we can start by saying that perhaps as many as 
600 million people in the world would have personally killed 
Che Guevara had they been given a chance!! When they finally
succeeded it was justifiable homicide and very, very few 
people will ever miss the poor stupid idealistic twit
except for a few naive misguided Marxist zealots. Really, 
he was just a dumb criminal, a misled baby boomer gone fatally
wrong. 


	"Criminals unite!". Unfortunately the Democrat candidates 
in the US, particularly Hillary and even some of the Republican
Bush-Bots, may soon be headed down a similar path but
with much less chance for survival!!  So I am offering an
alternative, a way to survive, and this is meant
simply as a logical prediction of the obvious terrifying
series of events about to unfold.  This in no way should
be taken as an advocacy of violence, for illegally 
vacationing in Guantanamo, or as a wake up and drum beat
for nincompoops.


So before you pop a blood vessel or start rounding up the
usual suspects read on:
  

	The problem is blood simple.  Capitalism works.  
It gives the little guy hope and a chance.  Socialism 
and fascism (that darling endorser of megacorporations),
do not!  In a healthy society if you don't like working
for one company you can always choose another.  If
one company is unethical or denies its workers
ownership and a say in operations, there are 100 others 
that will.  If a group needs help, you have a dozen different 
ways of providing it and a dozen different organizations 
and philosophies for delivery.


	If a company is oppressing third world people by slave
labor (e.g. remember Kathy Lee Gifford)or imposing huge
salaries on its elected CEO's you can expose the evil
and legislate changes. But with a socialist government,
there is no separation of corporation, religion,
and state, they are all the same!!  There is only one
company to work for, only one philosophy. With large
governments as well as with megacorporations, the people
(i.e. the assumed sheeple) are so desperately separated
from the supposedly beneficent leadership that often a
sort of top-down mob rule becomes common (like a kangaroo 
traffic court but on a much larger scale).


 	Under such misguided zeal people can be slaughtered
or enslaved in droves for just a change in perception or slant, 
e.g. per Stalin or per the president of United Fruit Company. 
And since the cooperatives are run for the good of the people 
they often become potential sweat shops, a kind of super
Walmart where everyone must sacrifice for the needs of the
many until they (i.e. you, the many) simply fall over dead
from exhaustion unable to support a bankrupt & entitled 
"ubervolk".    

	 What really gums up the works, however, is a silly
thing called ownership.  On the one hand it is a benchmark
by which the individual is rewarded, is motivated and can measure
success. On the other hand it is the photo album in grandma's
dresser that reassures us of the continuity of family and self
worth.  But in a socialist state everything is technically
owned by the state and you are expected respect that.
Mistakes and their memory then are erased repeatedly by 
property seizure and by heavy handed bureaucrats
enforcing the official version of the Pollyana-ocracy.   
 

	Tragically respect is thus so very rarely two way. How
can megacorporations or a soviet governance respect the
individual, especially at the top level, a rara avis indeed?
Grandma's chest is used in place of heating oil or plowed
under to make way for a more profitable strip mall.  Photo
albums and Yankee pot roast recipes are narcissism,
"forbidden on the international socialist banking
transponder".  Thinking, philosophy, technology and religion
are equally against the law, the obvious spawn of devils who
would corrupt the 'system'.


	But people understand this.  People are but small
furry animals, but they will not tolerate the bull crap.
They can easily become very, very angry small furry
animals in need of simple comforts and the respect of
knowing that others will not take their things, make their
lives miserable, or move their cheese. Life is simply too 
short for these things, too short to have a centralized city
computer or a goofy corporate makeover screw them out of
everything they love and need on a daily basis.  But this
was exactly the case in the old USSR, in Russia before the 
dawning of a little common sense! 


	Centralized planning means you often can't & don't have
any control over your own life.  It is more difficult to
live. The central planners, the experts from afar know best!
The little butcher shop on the corner has no owner, and
no one can say if or when the Veggan planners will provide
bologna or bacon.  There are ten butchers but no steak.  
To steal a pork chop is a state crime. The local soviet
or fascist corporation quality circle may, after due
process, be able to provide relief to a starving child
who is dying of a soy milk replacement diet created by
the state but only after executing the poor state drone,
the developer, the evil individual who created this horrid curse.  


But what of the butcher him- or herself who wants to build
aluminum ice boats? "From each according to their capabilities"
this is often the corporate and always the socialist mantra.
And since the computer says the bulk of complaints are about
meat, we must obviously need more butchers!!  And just what
sort of ghoul is picked by the state to be a butcher???? 
   Job requirement: "must like murdering small animals!".  


   "To each according to your needs."
But since when does anyone above dog catcher have a clue
as to what your needs are??? Hillary does, Obama does, 
McCain does!!!   ========Not!!=======
 

	And while ultimately ownership and land barely matters
(In the end most people are intelligent enough to know that
the worms win.), in the short run if you do not fight you
could lose everything: cheese, family, country, lore, 
science, history, ethics, love, and all humanity.  
 	

		By contrast, several capitalist economists have
predicted and many have shown that pretty much everyone
can become rich in many, many, ways within a capitalist
democracy and still provide a responsible safety net to
catch the unfortunate.  Competing interests, charitable
organizations, and supply and demand, makes sure that all
the children can and usually do have real milk, but only if
all the corporations aren't merged into one, only if the 
ignorant, stupid insane litany of socialism is not embraced
as "impressive, intellectual, wonderful goodness",... only if
problems remain as addressable and manageable locally,
and only if ownership, ethics, and management aren't
sacrificed and rendered abstract, lost, unreachable and
ever shifting.  


	But within any society, capitalist or communist, ethics
and sound decision making are the greatest responsibility
of every citizen. The chain is only as good as its 
weakest links.  And short chains are better than long ones
(where have I heard that before). Reinforcing this, in a
republic such as ours, the responsibility is perceived
to fall to the individual and to be robbed by the evil of
monster corporations and governments.  This is the 
proper scheme of things in any fair society, the shortest chain!
By contrast,in a socialist state the responsibility is perceived 
to lie with the state and to be robbed by the evil individuals
and corporations.  And within the monster corporation,
the responsibility is perceived ...etc.


Summary: in socialism and in many megacorporations the citizen, 
"our comrade", our customer is secretly or publically reviled,
but consider that the citizen is always a puny evil
compared to the looming hulk of evil that can be generated
by "teams" or "communes "acting in concert "for the good of 
the people" but without a rigid code of ethics or 
consultation or priority given to the concerned individual.
Is it therefore any surprise that systems only succeed which
can reward and groom the individual as a responsible team of
one, e.g. the "Republic" as envisioned in the Federalist papers,
some Buddhists sects, and some of the smaller, more private
communist and religious communities. These continue to be the
most successful economic and social engines!  


	It doesn't take much of a genius to realize that these
problems therefore would seem to have less to do with any of the 
systems than upon their integration.  But pay attention. If
you really feel that way you need to seriously reread the
opening paragraphs of this treatise.  You are not thinking
clearly! The goodness and success of the individual insures the
prosperity of the whole under any system and not the other way
around! But what systems breed that virtue consistently 
(or die trying)?  Fascism and Socialism usually do not.  


	Negativism, on the other hand, kills productivity and 
desire in any effort or society. And granularity, how many
people it takes to raise a child or screw in a light bulb
has absolutely nothing to do with the economic system but
is most frequently incorrect in a socialist or megacorporate
system! My grandfather had a theory he called "the big wheel,
little wheel theorem": Corporations and governments start 
out as a loose aggregation of small successful wheels.  If 
any one wheel fails the penalty is small and the statistics 
for failure can be high. But as the more successful wheels
gobble up the smaller wheels, the penalty for failure becomes
larger and larger while the statistics for failure still 
remain quite high.  Ultimately there is an economic or social
crash and to survive, people must create their own wheels, 
and the process starts all over again.  This theory bodes ill 
for fascist (large corporation rule) or socialist (large govern-
ment rule via some sort of Democratic structure) systems.
Both approaches assure certain and guaranteed death and
misery!!  Allowing companies like AT&T, Microsoft, or Walmart to
grow too large is one such formula for catastrophe.  Go to
Wikipedia and look up the story of the Chiquita Corporation
as an example.
 

  Hillary and most of the other candidates appear to not
understand any of this.  For example, Hillary is often
full of rant and rave over the virtues of government 
nurturing, but as espoused through a shower of hatred and
negativity which insures failure.  Her behavior in trying
to secretly organize health care into a monolithic (no options)
multitiered megabureaucracy showed the classic dichotomy of
respect in many socialist and large-corporation approaches,
showing how little respect she had for the very people she was
trying to help while tearfully posing as their advocate!  The
current amnesty for aliens legislation is similarly conceived
and just as fatally flawed! 


	In addition, like so many gung-ho socialists she 
appears to have both a severe lack of understanding plus the 
insane hatreds, biases, loony tune logic, and the 
backstabbing ludicrously dangerous beliefs of Engels and
Marx. These consumed Russia and even today still assume
evil in all things non socialist while denying even the
most simple justice for the individual. If you can't deal
with the simple ethics of religion, then just get rid of it!
Which do you want determining your fate, a Troika (AKA a
traffic court where the jury of judges is in the back pocket
of the state) looking out for the state coffers, or a simple
 jury where justice depends on common sense and the shared 
empathy of your fellow man (as opposed to
the hardened profits and the blind rigidity of the laws
of the state)?? 

Is it a surprise that tax courts do not permit a jury?

Fascist leaders who would bury the number #2 corporation,
the Enrons, the MCI's and the the K-Marts, are little better than
socialist crooks but the process is slower. At least so far you 
still have a choice.  But don't count on that choice, or the
ownerships it implies, to last much longer in the US.


		So,  Duck!!! 
	Aunt Mary will make that mistake and then, by the most
murderous force imaginable, will look out for and protect her
grandmother's photo album and her beloved Uncle Tom. A billion
Aunt Martha's, Aunt Jeanne's, Uncle Harry's will also arise. 
And soon millions of people will see they are being enslaved,
about to be swindled and socialized out of their life's work,
their simple ownerships, their choices, their beliefs, their
loves, their rights, their heritage and their sanity & logic.
It won't matter much whether they are tired, poor, huddled,
vigorous or rich, the result will still be bloodshed. For
example, just librarians, understanding a need for historical
preservation alone, could be enough to ensure the death of
our next president (per H.G. Wells or George Orwell). For
socialism and fascism both do not tolerate well the 
occasional discordant book, 
its library,
or its librarians!!  
And librarians can be very fiesty


     So Hillary, and others on the left and right with similar
aspirations should be denied democratically.  For if they
are not, then death follows swiftly on both sides, and
be aware that fascism is not the alternative, it is just
another way to make the same pitiful mistakes.  Understand
too this is not the Hollywood, lollipop class warfare
envisioned by goofballs like Che or Lenin or even Hitler.
This is people standing up for simple respect, for a choice
of philosophies and systems, a denial of megacontrols and 
endless social traffic courts, a denial of the mantra that 
permits intellectuals or corporate gurus to "move your
cheese" have your dog (or you) spayed or neutered,
or kill your son or daughter in some grand social cleansing.


Socialism positively and completely sucks especially in a 
corporate environment!!! Nobody knows currently how to
fix it.  And a logical corollary is that endowment of teams
with any special powers, respect or privileges must be suspect,
and should be examined skeptically and carefully to determine 
harm to the individual's productivity, capability and essence.  
And the result is: see History 101, it could be endless
suffering, redrum and starvation, senseless slaughter by
both sides.  


     Or, in the meantime, since Hillary may become a global
target,a dangerous anachronistic Leninist freak show playing
out her bloody Shakespearian death scenes reminiescent of that
bitter and failed atheist USSR shadow world of yesteryear
(while claiming to do what Christ did so really well 2000 years
ago), we may assume that while several million angry people
might be denied, e.g. Che Guevara, several hundred million
will be a somewhat bigger problem. And her body
guards will then become simply an encumbrance to running
fast enough!!


	Since Cuba is nice this time of year, especially
Guantanamo, I vote that, before we let this thing turn bitter,
we start showing personal responsibility, start working
harder to automate the production of prosperity,
demonstrate the power of positivity, democracy and 
generosity by shipping all those left and right wing 
whacko candidates (you know, the goofy ones in the debates)
to the sandy beaches of our socialist friends to the
south for a long, long vacation where they have free,
fly infested, vomit on the floors health care; they
don't precipitate endless bloodshed and suffering; they
don't move our cheese; and they don't pretend to manage our
401K's, our social security fund, our children or 
our children's future capabilities & needs for the next 75
years or so (i.e. in seeming blood soaked perpetuity!!).


	Since Castro is old, and since it takes a village to 
raise a socialist crumb catcher, it seems like the perfect
solution. We provide the entire village, we ship them all our 
politicians.  We can also provide at cost all the rum, LSD, 
and socialist/pirate run daycare centers ever needed right 
there on the beach where our ex-politicos and Johnny Depp will
teach the native population & displaced Taliban the error of
their ways and how to sword fight with rubber swords and get
parrots to sit on their shoulders.  They could even raise their
own parrots and rubber trees.  Then we shoot a "Pirates of the 
Caribbean" sequel and give each of them an obscene share of
the profits, and just sit back and see how many get back to 
Key West alive to enjoy the rewards.  In the meantime the
marines sit offshore with high def. digital cameras, extra
rum and a bucket of extra high voltage tazers (and other 
weapons) just in case the party starts to drag or actually
becomes an out of control *party, if you know what I mean. 


After all, weapons in a democratic society occasionally
need a good cleaning and periodic reliability testing. 


 (PS: my modifiers don't 'dangle' they simply
 have multiple personalities)
*************************************************
When I first wrote this, there was no cap and trade
debate. There were no backroom unconstitutional deals,
no obamacare snake oil deal for sleezing away 20% of
the US economy while potentially bankrupting millions
of doctors and hospitals turning hospitals into the
socialist butcher shop described above. There was
no backroom theft of 12 trillion dollars in socialist
and political graft disguised as stimulus packages
with a 90%/10% socialist tilt. And actual unemployment
rates had not soared to nearly 20% with the stock
market in ruins.Senator Dodd had not announced 
retirement claiming that his warnings to President
Clinton to not remove banking and stock controls, 
controls meant to prevent economic catastrophe, had 
gone unheeded. I had not lost my job due to the downturn
and people still didn't understand how dangerous
George Bush, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama really were.
  They still don't! That said, one last comment needs be made.  
=======Socialism and Fascism Suck!!!=========

 *Socialist